8 States Changing Their Crypto Policies — Is Yours One of Them? #CriptoNews

Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve surely heard about cryptocurrency by now or have at least heard the term. Over the past several years, cryptocurrency has emerged as an alternative currency that can be bought and sold as a digital asset.

While some have embraced crypto like President Trump, others have not and this includes some U.S. states.

Read Next: 13 Cheap Cryptocurrencies With the Highest Potential Upside for You

For You: Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025

PYMNTS reported that since Trump took office for his second term, he’s pushed the idea of creating a crypto reserve with plans to make the U.S. the capital of cryptocurrency.

In March, Trump signed an executive order to create a “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.” The order mandates the establishment of a “United States Digital Asset Stockpile” to serve as a secure account for the management of federally held digital assets.

Discover Next: How To Get a 10% Return on Investment (ROI): 10 Proven Ways

It’s explained that the U.S. government currently holds a significant amount of Bitcoin (BTC), but has yet to implement a policy to maximize Bitcoin as a “unique store of value in the global financial system.” Ultimately, Trump wants to harness the power of crypto to the country’s advantage.

While the president is taking action to make crypto a relevant store of value at the federal level, some states that initially set out to establish their own crypto reserves are walking back the idea.

Some states had plans to allocate a percentage of their public funds to invest in Bitcoin. But now, these states are rejecting the proposed crypto legislation:

• Florida

• Arizona

• Montana

• North Dakota

• Oklahola

• Pennsylvania

• South Dakota

• Wyoming

For example, AInvest reported that a pair of bills proposed in Florida, House Bill 487 and Senate Bill 550, were created to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve at the state level. However, lawmakers are walking back their legislative efforts. Ultimately, the bills faced opposition and pushback before passage and were withdrawn. The state’s legislative inaction could slow down the adoption and relevance of Bitcoin as a viable digital asset.

In Arizona, similar crypto legislation made it further than it did in Florida. It passed both chambers of government, only to be vetoed by the state’s governor. Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs ultimately rejected legislation that planned to invest part of the state’s retirement fund into Bitcoin.

“Arizonans’ retirement funds are not the place for the state to try untested investments like virtual currency,” Hobbs wrote in a letter to the state senate president, as reported by PYMNTS.