Crypto frenzy: With Bitcoin above $100,000, will ‘Hodlers’ have the last laugh? #CriptoNews

US politicians have joined the party: Donald Trump is appointing pro-crypto officials, eyeing a Bitcoin reserve and even hawking his own coin. So are punters, who are trying their hand and losing their shirts in the risky meme-coin market.

Like the 18th-century carnival of Rome attended by the poet Goethe, where foolish behaviour save knifing and brawling was allowed, it’s mystified tourists who are in the minority.

Right now, it’s Anthony Scaramucci of all people whose analysis makes the most sense: Bitcoin’s new milestone shows it’s gained wider acceptance as a tradable asset and portfolio investment, offering both big gains and gut-wrenching draw-downs (the last peak-to-trough fall was around 76%).

The flip-side of having no intrinsic value and a decentralized architecture with a huge energy footprint means that nobody uses Bitcoin to buy groceries, though: Only 7% of US consumers hold Bitcoin, and a survey published last month by the UK Financial Conduct Authority found only 16% of people who owned crypto used these tokens for payments.

Sceptics focus on the lack of real-world adoption—yet, it’s speculators banking on so-called digital gold who’ve come out richer.

Another point in favour of ‘Hodlers’ [named after a famous ‘Hodl’ call to hold crypto that became an insider-joke meme] is that it represents a bet on the power of the incoming US president—somewhat ironically for a movement originally forged by libertarian cypher-punks.

Almost $10 billion has flowed into Bitcoin exchange-traded funds since Trump’s win, which makes sense given the likely gains to be had from regulatory forbearance.

Gary Gensler’s departure from the US Securities and Exchange Commission likely means more breathing space for tokens that have laboured under the “unregistered securities” label, making US-based Coinbase Global an obvious beneficiary of onshore trading flows and products; its shares have doubled this year.

A friendlier regulatory atmosphere means we should expect more financial institutions to join in, even in risk-averse Europe.

Still, even pro-crypto folks know there are limits to this trade. We’re far from Friedrich Hayek’s vision of the “de-nationalization of money,” in which the state would ideally cede monopoly control of currency to the competitive private sector.

Trump’s recent call to Brics to accept dollar dominance shows he’s far from a crypto purist. A Bitcoin strategic reserve, with all the risk involved for US taxpayers, seems like a bridge too far.

And while ‘digital gold’ is a handy moniker that lets optimists imagine another tenfold rise for Bitcoin—taking its market capitalization to $20 trillion, or on par with gold—its price has lately been correlated with tech stocks on the Nasdaq index, suggesting real-world macro conditions must remain healthy to maintain that speculative lustre.

For now, they are: US monetary policy is loosening and tech stocks like Nvidia and Palantir are rocketing (and have outperformed Bitcoin this year). But if the twin engines of the US economy and stock market sputter—perhaps due to tariffs or inflation—it may undermine Bitcoin.

There are other, longer-term questions posed by this rally. The first is just how dangerous the gamblification of finance could yet be in a world of 24/7 trading apps, legalized sports betting and instant payments—something crypto fans tend to dismiss.

Like two sides of the same coin, crypto rallies expose punters to a proliferation of scams and get-rich-quick schemes.

The urge to make money fast and replicate the seemingly out-of-reach gains of the early adopters can lead to horror shows like the Hawk Tuah meme-coin or the baffling rise of Peanut the Squirrel’s token (market cap: $1.2 billion.)

There will need to be re-regulation ahead, and maybe a total rethink of how the lines between investing and gambling are policed.

The second is whether there is already a glimpse of a future financial system beyond the speculation. Complex systems take time to emerge—which crypto doubters might also miss.

Maybe new experiments, such as First Abu Dhabi Bank and Libre Capital’s announcement this week of a stable-coin lending pilot backed by tokenized money-market funds, are the budding indicators of where this Wild West of digital trading might end up.

The hope is that this carnival is close to maturity. Yet, the history of financial manias, especially those with political encouragement, suggests a few more accidents are on the way. ©Bloomberg